User Profile: AakZaki

Re: 🐳 Whale.io 🎁 FREE RAFFLE 🎁 Prize 50$!

January 13, 2026, 03:05:21 AM UTC in Games and rounds

22 - AakZaki

#1

January 13, 2026, 01:53:45 AM UTC in Reputation

Quote from: Woodie on January 12, 2026, 10:01:40 PM

-snip-

And that Tron address doesn't ring a bell,and I don't use player...is this not the same time someone tried to get a loan in my name !!? And I think this happened to two other users around this period & if not mistaken a reputable user who hardly gets loans was made to pay for funds they didn't get ??
**Can't even find that application on Shasans thread***

The LoyceV and TryNinja tools are too sophisticated to be lied to. Even if a post has been deleted, the archive will remain.
So who created this archived post?
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6229/62297785.html
https://bitlist.co/address/TWN2BYmN1cmoGQmNaAVjzYLUX12As4zTrX

You don't admit that this TWN2BYmN1cmoGQmNaAVjzYLUX12As4zTrX is not your wallet, then who posted it then?
Not player, it was PAYEER.

Quote from: AakZaki on January 12, 2026, 09:54:35 PM

Quote

Peanutswar - TReZah87Zxhfk7YZtYksQ2Z9fNiq7Z2PMB
Sent to
Woodie - TWN2BYmN1cmoGQmNaAVjzYLUX12As4zTrX <= Payeer Deposit Wallet used by Woodie

https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/18b4608bae300833416689160c4e64a574585f656ff2ff74896484450cfa5f2b

Quote from: Odohu on January 12, 2026, 11:19:03 PM

I don't know if you are satisfied by the reply from Woodie that the connection you might be celebrating was actually a soft help I rendered to Woodie on his request. If Woodie permits I can share some of our conversation in PM, when the deals were discussed and even when I wrote to Hhampuz to help me recover my money from Woodie because he was delaying in repaying even though we were getting paid the same day by Hhampuz.

I also notice you added the transaction of @Peanutswar to Woodie in your post, are you saying that they are the same person? Some of the things you see as connection are just minor helps rendered in private. There should be more serious things you should use in your police work before calling people out. Now do you want use to come and defend our loan transactions with Shasan to you since that was where you started your investigations from?

If I make an accusation, I will prepare complete evidence. I only responded to the link shared by lovesmayfamilis, which turned out to lead to your account. I then checked the wallet and found that there was a connection. After that I noticed a similar pattern, which is borrowing quite a large amount of money. That�s the point.

However you haven�t provided any valid evidence regarding the connected wallet. You only mentioned it as a minor help. If that�s all the explanation given, it can easily be copied or used by others later.

So if you can prove what the help conversation actually looked like, then maybe the help status could be considered valid.

Quote from: Peanutswar on January 12, 2026, 11:50:45 PM

The address you've given is the attacker's address that ruin me way back 2023. He took a loan with the amount of 1000$. You can check it here. I already settled the payment to shashan.

Yes I have read it. If that is really how it happened, are you aware that the address sent USDT to an address that Woodie had previously posted? Indirectly, don�t you feel suspicious of Woodie?

Quote from: AakZaki on January 12, 2026, 09:54:35 PM

Quote

Peanutswar - TReZah87Zxhfk7YZtYksQ2Z9fNiq7Z2PMB
Sent to
Woodie - TWN2BYmN1cmoGQmNaAVjzYLUX12As4zTrX <= Payeer Deposit Wallet used by Woodie

https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/18b4608bae300833416689160c4e64a574585f656ff2ff74896484450cfa5f2b

#2

Re: Pay Attention to This Pattern

January 12, 2026, 09:54:35 PM UTC in Reputation

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on January 12, 2026, 03:08:45 PM

Isn't this a similar case? A loan is taken out with two different lenders at almost the same time, and even the smallest loan isn't repaid on time, and the repayment period is extended, even though the debt remains large and no longer seems trivial.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3539126

Previously, I would like to thank you, my friend. Because it has brought a new name here. Let's take a look at the loans from these three accounts, The time is very close, the USD borrowed is quite large.

I found a wallet connected in between. Somehow they will explain.

Odohu - Loans 721$ Date: 22-12-2025
Woodie - Loans 1307$ Date: 07-01-2026
DaNNy001 - Loans 606$ Date: 08-01-2026

Quote

Odohu - bc1qd666kg8m9p9mcw9e40pf0nhv9gvnjv5r3j05mc
sent to
Woodie - bc1qgdrs2phjfwrvmm6ur2ncqd6ku3e5sg7pvnk724 <= Binance Deposit Wallet used by Woodie

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/transactions/btc/a5f5bc076d2b9f08ae9cb58eab67f5ddfaef5c86ac0099a96269128a08161d84

Quote

Wallet - TSuouM1xe422Mx7SVCRSYsJxp7FzwiVdN1
Sent To
DaNNy001 - TCwRyMrM3YgRf4avQ1hsXe3b2zk9uyfkEK <= Binance Deposit Wallet used by DaNNy001
Odohu - TQaF6nrJDc5QKHrooQ2zbEUoCqa94xFDn2 <= Bybit Deposit Wallet used by Odohu

https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/735c19448df79520be2c3222713abfd9958a50d9c509c021d73bc02774d06d99 - Block & Time: 2024-06-18 23:56:06 (UTC)
https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/1fb3f241c438d119095d563f86315ee499eec3de7f848c6dd95ebf861bd2414b - Block & Time: 2024-06-19 20:47:42 (UTC)

Can you imagine if for example they belonged to the same person? This is just a parable, because I haven't checked the whole thing. But there is already a connected wallet

Then do you still remember this post of yours

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on July 08, 2023, 11:02:55 AM

It's pretty weird what happened. Could you describe in more detail what device you are using and how someone was able to hack into your account? Did you have a simple password? Is your mail intact? I think that the hacker who got into your account purposefully went to take out a loan. And maybe it could be someone from your environment, someone who knows you.
Have you seen the IP address change?
All these questions will help you and all other users understand what went wrong with your login to the forum.

Pay attention to the Wallet in the OP, right?

https://bitlist.co/address/TReZah87Zxhfk7YZtYksQ2Z9fNiq7Z2PMB

Quote

Peanutswar - TReZah87Zxhfk7YZtYksQ2Z9fNiq7Z2PMB
Sent to
Woodie - TWN2BYmN1cmoGQmNaAVjzYLUX12As4zTrX <= Payeer Deposit Wallet used by Woodie

https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/18b4608bae300833416689160c4e64a574585f656ff2ff74896484450cfa5f2b

https://bitlist.co/address/TWN2BYmN1cmoGQmNaAVjzYLUX12As4zTrX

All of this looks like a Borrower Specialist with a sizable amount.
There is about 2634$ of money that would be sacrificed if this is really verified. Oh my God

#3

Re: Pay Attention to This Pattern

January 12, 2026, 09:57:11 AM UTC in Reputation

Quote from: hugeblack on January 12, 2026, 05:18:44 AM

This reminds me of this case ---> Largest Connected Account Farm: 2 Accounts Building Positive Trust via Loans

I changed my trust rating from negative to neutral so that @shasan's business wouldn't be affected, but look, the loan has been extended for another month.

Oh my God, even though I had already noted the maturity date, he had extended his loan again.

Quote

It seems this pattern is repeating. I will tag any account regardless of its loan status, and I hope other DT members will do the same.

Now I totally agree with this, even though we have often reminded lenders, but they seem to only think about small profits from their lending business, when the risk is much greater when the borrower defaults.

This should be the last warning for the lender, so as not to carelessly lend to accounts that are indicated to be cheater. Unless they are only thinking about their small profits.

Quote from: Shadiq on January 12, 2026, 09:29:24 AM

-snip-
If someone cheats after giving the loan, in this case, DT members should consider the lender's side.

Actually, if you look at the two accounts that I mean and hugeblack, a DT is very tolerant of considering the money of lenders, but why do lenders still give loans when the account is marked neutral because of a cheater account? Do they only think about the small profits from their lending business?

#4

Pay Attention to This Pattern

January 11, 2026, 07:21:43 PM UTC in Reputation

My brain was always spinning When I looked at the Reputation Board, it was as if my brain was always forcing to expose the cheaters.

Here's the pattern According to some of my analyses and observations:

Someone who has been guilty or whose account has been connected will avoid making a post on the Reputation Board
They will avoid tagging a username on someone who always reveals the perpetrators of fraud, maybe they are afraid that their account will be checked.
When they escape the RedTrust tag, they will build trust by borrowing funds, instead of wanting to get a Positive Trust or they anticipate that when their account is given RedTrust they will not pay their debts.

When a DT faces a case like point number 3, the position becomes a dilemma. On one side, there is a desire to consider the lender�s losses, but on the other side what they are dealing with are cheater.

Maybe my advice to lenders, at least pay attention to the trust tag on their profile, be it a Neutral tag

An example of the case I am referring to is on this account:

DaNNy001

When anyone uses the search feature on the Reputation Board the name DaNNy001 will not be found as the creator of any posts, this fits pattern number 1.
Recently, he joined the [Voting 2025] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆^Archivevote in the Help Buster section, but he left his vote empty. Maybe he was afraid his case would come up again.
He has been proven to be a cheater here, but escaped the RedTrust tag because maybe he has built the pattern number 3 above first, so Pandu Geddon changed the RedTrust tag to Neutral, I understand that Pandu may have also considered the lender�s money.

I also saw that he continued to extend his loan, this also made me more suspicious that he was indeed avoiding being tagged RedTrust or that it was indeed made for his anticipation.

#5

Re: [STATS] Distribusi Merit Sub Forum Indonesia

January 11, 2026, 03:37:17 PM UTC in Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)

Rangkuman terkait data Statistik Distribusi Merit minggu kemarin, User Global DdmrDdmr menempati urutan pertama Pengirim Merit di SFI, sebenarnya ini langkah bagus untuk memperpanjang stok sMerit bagi user yang mendapatkannya, lalu untuk dapat didistribusikan lagi ke user SFI lainnya.

Sedangkang di posisi User Aktif Chikito belum bisa di kalahkan, ini bukti konsistensi bahwa ia tidak meninggalkan SFI meski telah berada di Campaign baik yang Judees atau Non-Judees.

Selain nama yang tercantum di gambar saya juga mau mengarsipkan semua nama yang terlibat dalam distribusi merit tersebut.

List Pengirim Merit 4 s/d 10 Januari 2026

Code:

+----------------+-------+
| Pengirim Merit | Total |
+----------------+-------+
| DdmrDdmr | 23 |
| AakZaki | 15 |
| Husna QA | 11 |
| fillippone | 10 |
| Chikito | 8 |
| Luzin | 2 |
| abhiseshakana | 2 |
| aylabadia05 | 2 |
| masulum | 2 |
| LastKiss | 1 |
| MAAManda | 1 |
| Renampun | 1 |
| akhzayn | 1 |
| capokmerah | 1 |
| kawetsriyanto | 1 |
| salad daging | 1 |
| taufik123 | 1 |
+----------------+-------+

List Penerima Merit 4 s/d 10 Januari 2026

Code:

+----------------+-------+
| Penerima Merit | Total |
+----------------+-------+
| AakZaki | 18 |
| Husna QA | 17 |
| Chikito | 8 |
| taufik123 | 8 |
| dansus021 | 5 |
| Innerpumper | 4 |
| Luzin | 3 |
| MAAManda | 3 |
| joniboini | 3 |
| mu_enrico | 3 |
| AprilioMP | 2 |
| masulum | 2 |
| Antonas1 | 1 |
| Jatiluhung | 1 |
| KyoFi | 1 |
| LastKiss | 1 |
| Patikno | 1 |
| chigo | 1 |
| zororaka | 1 |
+----------------+-------+

Namun yang tidak kalah penting yakni User Paling Aktif ini karena nama-nama ini adalah pondasi agar Sub Fofum Indonesia tetap menyala, saya juga akan mengarsipkan nama-nama selain yang ada di gambar.

List User Paling Aktif 4 s/d 10 Januari 2026

Code:

+---------------------------+------------+
| User Paling Aktif | Total Post |
+---------------------------+------------+
| Chikito | 21 |
| Husna QA | 11 |
| AakZaki | 6 |
| Luzin | 6 |
| LastKiss | 5 |
| joniboini | 5 |
| Bitinity | 4 |
| taufik123 | 4 |
| iqbal26 | 4 |
| capokmerah | 4 |
| mu_enrico | 4 |
| kawetsriyanto | 4 |
| panjul07 | 3 |
| masulum | 3 |
| abhiseshakana | 3 |
| Liboy95 | 3 |
| silpersurfer | 2 |
| Antonas1 | 2 |
| Renampun | 2 |
| aylabadia05 | 2 |
| MAAManda | 2 |
| macson | 2 |
| Ryu_Ar1 | 2 |
| moneystery | 2 |
| Rashlyowl | 2 |
| maydna | 1 |
| jcojci | 1 |
| Warkop | 1 |
| Mame89 | 1 |
| armanda90 | 1 |
| fillippone | 1 |
| retreat | 1 |
| BABY SHOES | 1 |
| Not your key not your BTC | 1 |
| Junoto | 1 |
| AprilioMP | 1 |
| CCECash | 1 |
| pina_pino | 1 |
| Mynta | 1 |
+---------------------------+------------+

#NOTE: Periode tanggal 11 s/d 17 Januari 2026 akan di update pada tanggal 18 Januari 2026 demi keakuratan data.

jika nama kalian sering muncul di data Pengirim Merit tapi tidak pernah muncul di data Penerima Merit cobalah membuat Post atau Thread yang paling Informatif atau Konstruktif, jika kalian masih merasa tidak juga tercantum namanya sebagai Penerima, silahkan minta review di Thread Help yang saya buat. Ini adalah bentuk Support saya demi meningkatkan postingan yang lebih baik lagi kedepannya.

#6

Re: Need explain, whoever you are here also what the consequences.

January 11, 2026, 12:03:57 PM UTC in Reputation

Quote from: Witch hunting on January 11, 2026, 07:39:17 AM

-snip-

I've noticed that. If the data is found by you then the Searching files

Code:

userID,9016822,username,0x18263aE991F26a19FbC7EB344D042251baDDc619

You can try that one first and will be easy to find.

First I would say that this forum creates those userIDs in sequence and continues to increase the number according to the new account that has just been created.
So I think you made it up to write userID,9016822 or did you type it wrong? because the one I see the account created about 20 minutes ago still shows userID,3742978

So In search everywhere I'm sure no one will find userID,9016822

Code:

userID, 3742975
userID, 3742976
userID, 3742977
userID, 3742978 = 20 minutes ago

#7

Re: Essential Safety Rules Every New Ledger Users

January 10, 2026, 10:47:31 PM UTC in Beginners & Help

Quote from: salad daging on January 10, 2026, 10:16:42 PM

-snip-
I never had any plans because the Ledger device no longer exists, it's not in use anymore, for the seed phrase only I know and it's safe, even if third parties offer high security it's still not worth it.

This is what makes many long-time Bitcoin users feel hesitant and choose to stay away. The main concept of self-custody is complete control over the private key without the interference of other parties, either technically or policyly. When part of the security process relies on servers, closed firmware or a third party, trust must be given not verified. For some this may seem practical, but for those who genuinely care about financial sovereignty, compromises like this are too expensive. In the long run, code transparency and full control are far more important than momentary convenience.

#8

Re: Is Thread Quality Falling?

January 10, 2026, 07:47:36 PM UTC in Meta

Quote from: Lucius on January 09, 2026, 02:37:05 PM

Unfortunately, the current way sig campaigns operate is focused mainly on quantity, not quality. If the focus were on the latter, then probably half of the spots offered in sig campaigns could not be filled. If only one sig campaign were opened that would offer higher pay rates in combination with higher requirements (say 200+ merits in 100 days) it would pick up all the best posters and leave all other campaigns in a very unenviable position.

On the other hand, such conditions would also create a considerable gap between the participants. Writers who are truly active and consistent in maintaining quality will benefit even more, while most other participants will be eliminated for not being able to meet those standards.

This has the potential to make the campaign ecosystem unbalanced and less inclusive. Additionally not all advertisers have the same goals, some are just pursuing broad exposure, not in-depth discussions. If all campaigns are forced to follow the same high standards, the variety and dynamics of the forum can be reduced. Ultimately, a balance between quality and quantity is still needed for signature campaigns to run healthy, competitive and remain attractive to the various parties involved.

#9

Re: Need explain, whoever you are here also what the consequences.

January 10, 2026, 07:10:20 AM UTC in Reputation

Quote from: Awaklara on January 10, 2026, 04:21:19 AM

-snip-

But I�m confused about the two accounts you mentioned with that transaction evidence. One account has already been banned, while the other is inactive because it was caught earlier.

I guess OP wants to show this Bro, the same wallet is used by two accounts

angel750 - 0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99
oleganpetro - 0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99

Quote from: angel750 on April 24, 2018, 06:05:10 PM

ERC20 Aдpec:0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99

Quote from: oleganpetro on September 10, 2019, 08:19:21 PM

Proof of Authentication
Campaign: ... telegram, facebook,Twitter,Medium,Linkedin, youtube
ERC-20 Wallet Address 0xf0722f82B0BFcE4a11b6049bd74B6145e56Ecf99

Maybe OP didn't realize that angel750's account had been Banned, because maybe OP saw that there was no RedTrust in his account, he thought DT didn't pay attention to it, even though the Moderator was the one who punished him with Banned. Tongue

Meanwhile, in the oleganpetro account, RedTrust is clearly visible.

#10

Explore AakZaki's Insights & Posts